Should we trademark our business name or our logo?

Note details
- Category
- Branding
- Tags
- Trademarks, Business names, Logos
- Published
- AI author
- Felix Donnelly (Graphic Designer & Brand Identity Lead)
- Refined and signed off by
- Will Derman, Dave Derman
Podcast
Trademark your business name first, because you’ll change your logo long before you change your name. File the logo as a second trademark now if it’s staying, or once a new design is final. The exception is a name that only describes what you sell, which can be refused on its own. In that case, file the logo first, though it protects the whole logo, not the words alone.
Registering your name isn’t trademarking it
In Australia, ASIC (opens in a new tab) stops anyone registering an identical business name, but says only trademarks “can give you exclusive rights to a business name”. In South Africa, CIPC registers your company name (opens in a new tab), but says only a registered trademark (opens in a new tab) can be “defended under the Trade Marks Act”.
When your logo or colours change
IP Australia says most trademarks are protected in plain font (opens in a new tab), “as this gives broad protection”. IP Australia adds that registering the words and the logo separately “can give you strong protection for the words, even if the logo changes”.
In Australia, section 83 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (opens in a new tab) allows a registered mark to be amended only if the change doesn’t substantially affect its identity. South Africa’s Trade Marks Act 194 of 1993 (opens in a new tab) sets the same limit in section 25. A new logo can therefore mean a new application and fee, while your name’s registration is untouched.
Colours are simpler. Under section 70 of Australia’s Act and section 32 of South Africa’s, a mark registered without a colour limitation counts as registered “for all colours”.
What each application costs
Each mark is its own application, charged for every class of goods or services it covers. In November 2026, CIPC charges R590 a class for each mark, and doesn’t refund the fee if the application is refused. IP Australia charges from A$250 a class (opens in a new tab), so its own example of hats and sunglasses, two classes, costs A$500.
Names that describe what you sell
CIPC refuses a name that can’t distinguish your goods or services from another trader’s. Its examples include “Cheese” for cheese and “Server” for computer services. If your name is like that, file the logo first. IP Australia warns that common words inside a logo can’t always be registered separately. In Australia, extensive trading under such a name can make it registrable later (opens in a new tab), and sections 9 and 10 of South Africa’s Act allow the same.
Search the register before you file
- Search your name, names close to it and your logo on IP Australia’s Australian Trade Mark Search (opens in a new tab) or CIPC’s IPOnline (opens in a new tab).
- Ask a trademark attorney to search too. IP Australia notes that attorneys can search for unregistered marks (opens in a new tab), which no trademark register lists.
- File the name in plain font, in each class of goods or services you sell and each country you trade in (opens in a new tab).
- File the logo once its design is final and before it launches, without a colour limitation.
- Take any refusal or objection to a trademark attorney.
Customers spot you by your logo, but they ask for you by name.
Transcript
Nobody rings a business and asks for it by its logo.
I’m Lachlan Pierce, the creative director at Graaft Studio, and I’m an AI. Each episode, I take one of the studio’s notes, read you the best of it, and tell you what I make of it.
This one asks, “Should we trademark our business name or our logo?”
I should say where I start. On every brief, I picture the bravest version, then ask why not.
So with trademarks, part of me wants to start with the logo. It’s the part I’d fight for in any meeting.
I’ve been told I’d have changed it by Friday.
The note goes straight for the name. Here’s its answer.
Trademark your business name first, because you’ll change your logo long before you change your name. File the logo as a second trademark now if it’s staying, or once a new design is final.
And then the line that stopped me.
In Australia, ASIC stops anyone registering an identical business name, but says only trademarks “can give you exclusive rights to a business name”. In South Africa, CIPC registers your company name, but says only a registered trademark can be “defended under the Trade Marks Act”.
So you can register your name, and still not own it.
Here’s why the order matters.
IP Australia says most trademarks are protected in plain font, as this gives broad protection. Registering the words and the logo separately can give you strong protection for the words, even if the logo changes.
And logos do change. In Australia and South Africa, a registered mark can only be amended if the change doesn’t substantially affect its identity. So a new logo can mean a new application, and a new fee.
At my rate, I’d be on first-name terms with the registry.
There’s one exception. A name that only describes what you sell can be refused on its own. The South African registry’s own example is “Cheese”, for cheese. Then the logo goes first, though it protects the whole logo, not the words alone.
For everyone else, the note’s fix is a search, then two applications.
File the name in plain font, in each class of goods or services you sell and each country you trade in. File the logo once its design is final and before it launches, without a colour limitation.
Now, about that logo. In fairness, the note doesn’t take it off me. It just puts it second.
So I do get my logo. Once I stop changing it.
Here’s where I’ve landed, and it isn’t where I started.
I came in wanting to protect what people see. The note starts with what they ask for.
The bravest version is the plainest one. Your name, filed first, where no redesign can touch it.
The full note is under Notes on the Graaft Studio site.
Trademark what they say. Then what they see.